Ever think, 'renting out an entire hotel is sooo neuvo-riche'?
Then you thought "I'm sick of being upstaged by Oprah giving away Volkswagens".
How about if you rented an entire country?
You can now rent the tiny Alpine nation of Liechtenstein at a rate of $70,000/night for a minimum of 2 nights...really not kidding. Don't worry about speaking German here, Liechtensteinians (?) are one of the most affluent and highly educated people worldwide, whatever you speak, they probably do too.
Here's the listing -> http://www.airbnb.com/rooms/59883
and here's where I saw it -> http://www.geekosystem.com/rent-liechtenstein-airbnb/
Blog about things I find interesting, or incredibly stupid. Mostly its to make fun of other people, post links I find funny and lower the amount of crap I post elsewhere - email me, feel free to comment and please click an ad from time to time!
Thursday, April 14, 2011
Really? I guess there isn't a category for inner beauty
or outer beauty for that matter, only publicists and marketing remain...
I can think of probably a dozen people off the top of my head more beautiful than JLo.
Oh wait, I will, in no particular order.

1 - Mila Kunis
2 - Alison Brie
3 - Cheryl Cole
4 - Natalie Imbruglia
5 - Kelly Brook
6 - Brooklyn Decker
7 - Anne Hathaway
8 - Evangeline Lilly
9 - Emma Watson
10 - Olivia Munn
11 - Bar Refaeli
12 - Diane Kruger
I couldn't agree more with wwtdd.com's headline -> "oh f**k you, People magazine"
I can think of probably a dozen people off the top of my head more beautiful than JLo.
Oh wait, I will, in no particular order.

1 - Mila Kunis
2 - Alison Brie
3 - Cheryl Cole
4 - Natalie Imbruglia
5 - Kelly Brook
6 - Brooklyn Decker
7 - Anne Hathaway
8 - Evangeline Lilly
9 - Emma Watson
10 - Olivia Munn
11 - Bar Refaeli
12 - Diane Kruger
I couldn't agree more with wwtdd.com's headline -> "oh f**k you, People magazine"
Labels:
wwtdd jlo people cover
Don't screw with roses
Labels:
high definite flowers
Wednesday, April 13, 2011
Here's an idea, maybe not destroy irreplaceable* things? - Smallpox
*means I'm aware that as long as its sequenced its not a total loss... by TODAY'S science standards.
To paraphrase the popsci article, stays of execution have happened for this idea a few times since the 70's. With the last KNOWN living samples of Smallpox being in 2 very far away from each other labs, developing nations (who would be most effected by a new outbreak) have been calling for its destruction for some time now.
I think this is a horrible idea, and popsci commenter All4it has a very good point. In addition, they're asking for the destruction of something that 1) possibly cannot be replicated 100%, 2) possibly could help save all of humanity in the future (after vaccinations for a seemingly dead threat have dwindled) and 3) we have no idea the implications.
Besides decades-old rumors of secret additional samples in less-than-friendly (to USA) nations, there is also the reasearch idea. We're STILL discovering things about other plagues that a living sample would be a fantastic resource for cute lab researchers (like wifey) to work with.
Sources -> http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2011-04/smallpox-destruction-debate-resurfaces-health-officials-prepare-annual-convention
http://www.livescience.com/13667-smallpox-virus-destruction-variola-vaccination.html
additional, related link -> http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2011-03/first-we-eradicated-smallpox-rinderpest-next
To paraphrase the popsci article, stays of execution have happened for this idea a few times since the 70's. With the last KNOWN living samples of Smallpox being in 2 very far away from each other labs, developing nations (who would be most effected by a new outbreak) have been calling for its destruction for some time now.
I think this is a horrible idea, and popsci commenter All4it has a very good point. In addition, they're asking for the destruction of something that 1) possibly cannot be replicated 100%, 2) possibly could help save all of humanity in the future (after vaccinations for a seemingly dead threat have dwindled) and 3) we have no idea the implications.
Besides decades-old rumors of secret additional samples in less-than-friendly (to USA) nations, there is also the reasearch idea. We're STILL discovering things about other plagues that a living sample would be a fantastic resource for cute lab researchers (like wifey) to work with.
Sources -> http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2011-04/smallpox-destruction-debate-resurfaces-health-officials-prepare-annual-convention
http://www.livescience.com/13667-smallpox-virus-destruction-variola-vaccination.html
additional, related link -> http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2011-03/first-we-eradicated-smallpox-rinderpest-next
Labels:
smallpox WHO possibly destroy
Libyan cell service restored by circumventing Tripoli's severed cables
Here's the short version:
Quadaffhi's goons severed the main hub that was the backbone connection for all of Libya's cellular network infrastructure. It was designed in such a way that all voice/data traffic was routed through the capital for snooping and management reasons. When Khadafi's regime started being overthrown by rebels, he cut the cables effectively reducing his enemy to a system of flags and smoke flares for communication.
So what happened? With the majority of the network infrastructure in place (just not a way of connecting to the rest of the internet) hackers gave it a new uplink (via U.A.E. and Qatari-funded satellites). They even went as far as extracting the old number/subscriber ID information from the Tripoli based servers in order to import them into this new database. Suddenly, those "can you hear me now" ads seem stupid.
I wonder if they bothered with visual voicemail or an app store?
Source -> http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2011-04/massive-hardware-hack-libyan-rebels-hijack-disabled-cell-phone-network via http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703841904576256512991215284.html?mod=fox_australian
Quadaffhi's goons severed the main hub that was the backbone connection for all of Libya's cellular network infrastructure. It was designed in such a way that all voice/data traffic was routed through the capital for snooping and management reasons. When Khadafi's regime started being overthrown by rebels, he cut the cables effectively reducing his enemy to a system of flags and smoke flares for communication.
So what happened? With the majority of the network infrastructure in place (just not a way of connecting to the rest of the internet) hackers gave it a new uplink (via U.A.E. and Qatari-funded satellites). They even went as far as extracting the old number/subscriber ID information from the Tripoli based servers in order to import them into this new database. Suddenly, those "can you hear me now" ads seem stupid.
I wonder if they bothered with visual voicemail or an app store?
Source -> http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2011-04/massive-hardware-hack-libyan-rebels-hijack-disabled-cell-phone-network via http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703841904576256512991215284.html?mod=fox_australian
Tuesday, April 12, 2011
Air France A380 clips a smaller weaker, less-french plane at JFK
Source -> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1375982/A380-jumbo-jet-crashes-passenger-jet-JFK-airport.html via http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=fMKGv3KFqKo
Labels:
A380 collision JFK airport
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






